Restorations made with FILTEK TM Z350XT resin vs Micerium resin [Restauraciones realizadas con resina FILTEK TM Z350XT vs resina Micerium]

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62574/7tfffy14

Keywords:

dental materials, acrylic resins, dental restoration permanent

Abstract

Objective: To compare restorations made with FILTEK TM Z350XT resin vs Micerium resin. Method: Systematic review of 25 articles. Results and Conclusion: FILTEK™ Z350XT resin is positioned as a superior choice for dental restorations due to its high mechanical strength, colour stability, durability and ability to maintain properties against chemical challenges and staining, as well as its potential to be modified with antimicrobial fillers. These characteristics make it ideal for restorations in functionally and aesthetically demanding areas. On the other hand, although Micerium resin performs acceptably in aspects such as colour stability and shade matching, its effectiveness is more conditioned by external factors such as polishing type and shade selection method, which may limit its predictability in certain cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Oliveira H, Ribeiro M, Oliveira G, et al. Mechanical and Optical Characterization of Single-shade Resin Composites Used in Posterior Teeth. Oper Dent. 2024;49(2):210-221. doi:10.2341/22-112-L

Bernaldo-Faustino JL, Dulanto-Vargas JA, Carranza-Samanez KM. In Vitro Effect of Mouthrinses on the Microhardness of Three Different Nanohybrid Composite Resins. Int J Dent. 2023;2023:9161639. Published 2023 Nov 7. doi:10.1155/2023/9161639

ElSheikh SK, Eid EG, Abdelghany AM, Abdelaziz D. Physical/mechanical and antibacterial properties of composite resin modified with selenium nanoparticles. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1245. Published 2024 Oct 19. doi:10.1186/s12903-024-04965-5

Dias HB, Bernardi MIB, Ramos MADS, et al. Zinc oxide 3D microstructures as an antimicrobial filler content for composite resins. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(6):634-643. doi:10.1002/jemt.22840

Naranjo Méndez J, Valdiviezo Gilces MJ. Efectividad y durabilidad de restauraciones de resina y amalgama, estudio comparativo: Effectiveness and durability of resin and amalgam restorations, comparative study. eoug [Internet]. 2023;6(1):29-36.

Ugarte-Mamani Freyshi, Sánchez-Tito Marco Antonio. Resina Filtek Z250 XT precalentada como agente cementante de restauraciones indirectas. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2021;58(2).

Christiani Juan José, Acevedo Edgardo Daniel, Rocha María Teresa. Estabilidad de Color de Tres Resinas Nanohíbridas en Relación al Tipo Pulido Realizado. Int. J. Odontostomat. [Internet]. 2023;17(1): 64-69.

Durán-Ojeda Gerardo, Tisi José Pablo, Urzúa Iván. Alternativas clínicas para el uso de composites Bulk-Fill compactables y fluidos: Reporte de un caso paso a paso. Odovtos [Internet]. 2021;23(1): 31-42.

Mosquera Muñoz MA, Charfuelan Inampues MD, Puccini Manzano G, Rozo Albarracin JE. Evaluación de la microdureza superficial de cementos resinosos y resina compuesta utilizada para cementación. Journal odont col [Internet]. 2022;15(30):9-17.

Migliorati M, Signori A. Long-term evaluation of orthodontic brackets shear bond strength with or without fluoride-releasing adhesive. Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2022;71(1):5-9. doi:10.23736/S2724-6329.21.04529-5

Quinzi V, Gallusi G, Carli E, Pepe F, Rastelli E, Tecco S. Elastodontic Devices in Orthodontics: An In-Vitro Study on Mechanical Deformation under Loading. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(7):282. Published 2022 Jun 28. doi:10.3390/bioengineering9070282

Geha O, Inagaki LT, Favaro JC, et al. Effect of Chemical Challenges on the Properties of Composite Resins. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:4895846. Published 2021 Dec 1. doi:10.1155/2021/4895846

De Angelis F, Vadini M, Capogreco M, D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M. Effect of Light-Sources and Thicknesses of Composite Onlays on Micro-Hardness of Luting Composites. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(22):6849. Published 2021 Nov 13. doi:10.3390/ma14226849

Narkedamalli RK, Muliya VS, Pentapati KC. Staining ability of herbal tea preparations on a nano-filled composite restorative material - an in-vitro study. F1000Res. 2023;11:1376. Published 2023 Jul 4. doi:10.12688/f1000research.128029.2

Menini M, Rivolta L, Manauta J, Nuvina M, Kovacs-Vajna ZM, Pesce P. Dental Color-Matching Ability: Comparison between Visual Determination and Technology. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(9):284. Published 2024 Sep 3. doi:10.3390/dj12090284

Published

2024-11-06

How to Cite

1.
Gines-León DM, Rosero-Rosero RR, Ibarra-Ramírez MB. Restorations made with FILTEK TM Z350XT resin vs Micerium resin [Restauraciones realizadas con resina FILTEK TM Z350XT vs resina Micerium]. SRS [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 6 [cited 2024 Dec. 26];3(especial odontologia):237-44. Available from: https://revistasinstitutoperspectivasglobales.org/index.php/sanitas/article/view/271

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.