Comparison of Biodentine, CEM cement and MTA in pulpotomy procedures [Comparación del Biodentine, el CEM cement y el MTA en procedimientos de pulpotomía]

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62574/pxjntr45

Keywords:

pulpotomy, calcium compounds, permanent teeth

Abstract

Objective: Compare Biodentine, CEM cement and MTA biomaterials in pulpotomy procedures on immature permanent teeth. Method: Systematic review following PRISMA 2020 methodology. A search was conducted in the EBSCO, PubMed, Elsevier and Cochrane Library databases, including 10 studies that evaluated the clinical and radiographic efficacy of biomaterials. Results: All three materials showed success rates of over 85% in preserving pulp vitality. MTA demonstrated greater dentin bridge formation capacity and antibacterial properties, but has a long setting time (3 hours) and is expensive. Biodentine showed similar results to MTA with significant advantages: short setting time (12 minutes), easy handling, and less tissue inflammation. CEM cement exhibited antibacterial properties and calcium ion release capacity, although with less mineralised tissue formation compared to MTA and Biodentine. Conclusion: All three biomaterials are viable for pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Zhou F, Deng J, Zou J, Wang Y. Materials for pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Mar 25];19(1):227. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0917-z

Sabbagh S, Sarraf A, Eghbal M. Vital pulp therapy of a symptomatic immature permanent molar with long-term success. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2025 Mar 25];11(4):347–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2016.19

Cushley S, Duncan H, Lappin M, Tomson P, Lundy T, Cooper P, et al. Pulpotomy for mature carious teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review. J Dent [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Mar 25];88:103158. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.005

Philip N, Suneja B. Minimally invasive endodontics: a new era for pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 25];233(12):1035–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-5316-1

Eshghi A, Hajiahmadi M, Nikbakht MH, Esmaeili M. Comparison of clinical and radiographic success between MTA and Biodentine in pulpotomy of primary mandibular second molars with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Int J Dent [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6963944

Abuelniel G, Duggal M, Kabel N. A comparison of MTA and Biodentine as medicaments for pulpotomy in traumatized anterior immature permanent teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Dent Traumatol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Mar 25];36(4):400–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12553

Tran X, Ngo L, Boukpessi T. Biodentine™ full pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis and apical periodontitis. Healthcare [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Mar 25];9(6):720. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060720

Amber A, Patel B, Gelfond J, Ruparel N. Outcome of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 25];12(1):19664. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20918-w

Nogueira E, Pinto K, Belladonna F, Ferreira C, Versiani M, De-Deus G. Success rate of permanent teeth pulpotomy using bioactive materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 25];56(9):1024–41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13939

Uyar D, Alaçam A. Evaluation of partial pulpotomy treatment in cariously exposed immature permanent molars: randomized controlled trial. Niger J Clin Pract [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Mar 25];24(10):1511–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_686_20

Guang J, Li J, Guo S. Comparison of pulpal vitalization and root canal therapy in symptomatic immature permanent molars. Cell Mol Biol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 25];68(2):178–82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2022.68.2.25

Hoseinifar R, Eskandarizadeh A, Parirokh M, Torabi M, Safarian F, Rahmanian E. Histologic evaluation of human pulp response to capping with MTA, CEM cement and Biodentine. J Dent [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Mar 25]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2019.81796.0

Kahler B, Na T, Lu J, Saoud T. Vital pulp therapy for permanent teeth with diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis: biological basis and outcome. Aust Dent J [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 25];68(S1):S110–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12997

Ruiz P, Cabanillas D, Saúco J, Segura J. Outcome of direct pulp capping in teeth diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp Dent [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 25];14(10):e594–603. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59668

Li W, Bo Y, Jing S. Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 25];19(7):e0305218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305218

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

1.
Melena-León AF, Montalvo-Cuadrado KJ, Turriago-Hurtado ES. Comparison of Biodentine, CEM cement and MTA in pulpotomy procedures [Comparación del Biodentine, el CEM cement y el MTA en procedimientos de pulpotomía]. SRS [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 29 [cited 2025 Oct. 20];4(especial3):17-2. Available from: https://revistasinstitutoperspectivasglobales.org/index.php/sanitas/article/view/797