Kennedy Class III removable partial denture design. Literature review [Diseño de prótesis parcial removible en clase III de Kennedy. Revisión de la literatura]
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62574/1s0vna24Keywords:
preventive dentistry, dental prosthesis, denturesAbstract
Objective: to study the design of removable partial dentures in Kennedy class III from a review of the literature. Method: systematic review was applied, the population was refined to 15 scientific articles. Results and Conclusion: Kennedy class III removable partial denture (RPD) design benefits significantly from technological advances in digital fabrication and the incorporation of implants to improve denture retention and functionality, the use of 3D printed patterns and CAD/CAM techniques are shown to optimise denture fit and accuracy, while the inclusion of implants provides greater stability, distribution of masticatory forces, which is essential for comfort and longevity of treatment, not only improve masticatory function and aesthetics, but also positively impact the patient's quality of life.
Downloads
References
Rokhshad R, Tehrani AM, Nahidi R, Zarbakhsh A. Fit of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated from 3D printed patterns versus the conventional method: An in vitro comparison. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(6):1144-1149. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.027
Fueki K, Inamochi Y, Wada J, et al. A systematic review of digital removable partial dentures. Part I: Clinical evidence, digital impression, and maxillomandibular relationship record. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66(1):40-52. doi:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00116
Charyeva OO, Altynbekov KD, Nysanova BZ. Kennedy classification and treatment options: a study of partially edentulous patients being treated in a specialized prosthetic clinic. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):177-180. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00809.x
Jeyapalan V, Krishnan CS. Partial Edentulism and its Correlation to Age, Gender, Socio-economic Status and Incidence of Various Kennedy's Classes- A Literature Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(6):ZE14-ZE17. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/13776.6124
Kumar SA, Pal AK, Mittal M, Rajesh P. Achieving aesthetics in deficient anterior maxillary ridge with a modified screw retained prosthesis for Kennedy's Class III situation. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(Suppl 2):S612-S615. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.04.006
Putra Wigianto AY, Goto T, Iwawaki Y, Ishida Y, Watanabe M, Ichikawa T. Treatment outcomes of implant-assisted removable partial denture with distal extension based on the Kennedy classification and attachment type: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):111. Published 2021 Nov 13. doi:10.1186/s40729-021-00394-z
Disha V, Čelebić A, Peršić S, Papić M, Rener-Sitar K. Correction to: Orofacial esthetics, chewing function, and oral health-related quality of life in Kennedy class I patients with mini-implant-retained removable partial dentures: A 3-year clinical prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(7):393. Published 2024 Jun 24. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05792-2
Disha V, Čelebić A, Peršić S, Papić M, Rener-Sitar K. Orofacial esthetics, chewing function, and oral health-related quality of life in Kennedy class I patients with mini-implant-retained removable partial dentures: A 3-year clinical prospective study [published correction appears in Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 24;28(7):393. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05792-2]. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(6):353. Published 2024 Jun 2. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05741-z
Zhang H, Ramos V Jr, Bratos M, Liu PP, He W. Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(6):1211-1220. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.008
Zancopé K, Abrão GM, Karam FK, Neves FD. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(6):528-33.e3. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.011
Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, et al. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(8):1515-1533. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
Ramchandran A, Agrawal KK, Chand P, Ramashanker, Singh RD, Gupta A. Implant-assisted removable partial denture: An approach to switch Kennedy Class I to Kennedy Class III. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16(4):408-411. doi:10.4103/0972-4052.179262
Rutkunas V, Gendviliene I, Auskalnis L, et al. Influence of Kennedy class and number of implants on the accuracy of dynamic implant navigation: An in vitro study using an X-ray free evaluation methodology. J Dent. 2023;139:104679. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104679
Araujo R, Zancopé K, Moreira R, Barreto T, Neves F. Mandibular implant-assisted removable partial denture - Kennedy Class I to Class III modification - Case series with masticatory performance and satisfaction evaluation. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(1):e71-e78. Published 2023 Jan 1. doi:10.4317/jced.59777
van Eekeren PJ, Aartman IH, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. The effect of implant placement in patients with either Kennedy class II and III on oral health-related quality of life: a prospective clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(4):291-296. doi:10.1111/joor.12370
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Copyright (c) 2024 By the authors. This article is open access and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
