Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
https://doi.org/10.62574/x8zajs28
1
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the
Ecuadorian context
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público
en el contexto ecuatoriano
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
ui.luiscrespo@uniandes.edu.ec
Universidad Autónoma Regional de los Andes, Ibarra, Imbabura, Ecuador
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8609-4738
ABSTRACT
The balance between individual rights and collective demands for security and stability is a central
challenge for the development and consolidation of a fair and efficient legal system. The aim is to
analyse the dynamics of interplay, citizens' rights and the preservation of public order in the
Ecuadorian context. A descriptive documentary type, impregnated with a bibliographic design, the
analytical-synthetic method was applied in an exploration of 15 scientific articles. Social and
economic challenges, from economic inequality to cultural diversity, influence citizens' perceptions
of the effectiveness of public order measures. Addressing these challenges requires a delicate
balance between protecting individual rights and implementing policies that ensure collective
security. As the intricacies of this interplay are explored, it reveals an intrinsic dynamic that manifests
itself in every corner of the country's legal and social context.
Descriptors: Law enforcement; State security; Human rights. (Source: UNESCO Thesaurus).
RESUMEN
El equilibrio entre los derechos individuales y las demandas colectivas de seguridad y estabilidad,
constituye un desafío central para el desarrollo y consolidación de un sistema jurídico justo y
eficiente. Se tiene por objetivo analizar la dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del
orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano. De tipo descriptiva documental, impregnada de un diseño
bibliográfico, Se aplicó el método analítico-sintético en una exploración de 15 articulos científicos.
Los desafíos sociales y económicos, desde la desigualdad económica hasta la diversidad cultural,
influyen en la percepción ciudadana sobre la efectividad de las medidas de orden público. Abordar
estos desafíos requiere un equilibrio delicado entre la protección de los derechos individuales y la
implementación de políticas que aseguren la seguridad colectiva. A medida que se exploran los
entresijos de esta interplay, se revela una dinámica intrínseca que se manifiesta en cada rincón del
contexto jurídico y social del país.
Descriptores: aplicación de la ley; seguridad del estado; derechos humanos. (Fuente: Tesauro
UNESCO).
Received: 19/09/2023. Revised: 08/10/2023. Approved: 18/11/2023. Published: 01/01/2024.
Research articles section
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
2
INTRODUCTION
In Ecuador's contemporary legal scenario, the intersection between citizenship and
public order emerges as a crucial axis for the understanding and consolidation of a
robust and equitable legal system (Azanza-Torres, 2022). This article dives deep
into the intrinsic relationship between citizenship as an active entity and the
maintenance of public order as an essential pillar of the rule of law (Villegas-Díaz,
2023). In a university environment, characterised by academic demand and
specialisation, it is imperative to explore the normative and conceptual complexities
that define the interplay between citizens' rights and the preservation of public order
in the Ecuadorian context (Rey-Varela, 2023), (Rincón, 2018).
This paper is based on the premise that the balance between individual rights and
collective demands for security and stability is a central challenge for the
development and consolidation of a fair and efficient legal system. From a university
educational perspective, this analysis seeks not only to unravel the legal foundations
that govern the citizenship-public order relationship, but also to provide a solid
conceptual basis that will enable legal scholars and practitioners to address with
depth and insight the emerging challenges in this complex normative framework.
Through an exhaustive review of current legislation, relevant judicial precedents and
an exploration of the social dynamics that define the Ecuadorian context, this article
aims to contribute to the academic and practical debate on how to reconcile citizen
aspirations with the preservation of a public order that guarantees security and
common welfare. In this intellectual journey, the aim is not only to analyse existing
legal provisions, but also to propose critical reflections that can illuminate future
discussions and decisions in the legal sphere.
Ultimately, this article stands as a vital tool for academic training in the field of law
in Ecuador, where a deep understanding of the relationship between citizenship and
public order is not only essential for the training of ethical and competent
professionals, but also for the construction of a society based on the fundamental
principles of justice, equity and respect for individual rights.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
3
Based on the above, the aim is to analyse the dynamics of interplay, citizens' rights
and the preservation of public order in the Ecuadorian context.
METHOD
At the heart of this descriptive documentary research, infused with a bibliographic
design and conducted through the application of the analytical-synthetic method, a
rigorous approach is forged to unravel the complexities inherent in the phenomenon
under scrutiny. This method not only constitutes the methodological scaffolding, but
a compass that guides the journey through a vast ocean of accumulated knowledge.
The bibliographic design, as the backbone of this research, stands as a beacon that
directs our gaze towards the vast bibliography related to the topic. The thorough
exploration of 15 scientific articles made up of previous works, legal documents and
academic sources constitutes the essence of this journey. Each page read is a step
towards a deeper understanding of the context, providing a solid foundation on
which the research conclusions will be built.
The descriptive nature of this research translates into a meticulous collection and
presentation of documentary data. Every detail, every nuance captured in the
bibliographical sources, contributes to the elaboration of a complete and detailed
picture of the phenomenon under study. The descriptive acts as a brush that
captures not only the general essence, but also the particularities that define the
dynamics of the relationship between citizenship and public order in the Ecuadorian
context.
The analytical-synthetic method was applied as a tool to break down and critically
examine the various pieces of the bibliographical jigsaw. Each work, each concept,
was subjected to an analytical scrutiny that reveals connections, contradictions and
underlying patterns. The ability to synthesise this information into a coherent whole
is the art that shapes a deeper understanding of the citizen-public order dynamic in
the Ecuadorian context.
This process is not linear; it is iterative. Constant review of the literature, repeated
application of analytical-synthetic analysis and continuous refinement of description
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
4
are essential elements. Each cycle of review drives a more refined understanding,
like a work of art that evolves with each additional stroke of the brush.
Ultimately, this method amalgamates the richness of bibliographic design, the depth
of the descriptive approach and the acuity of the analytic-synthetic method to shape
an investigation that not only describes the citizenship-public order dynamic in
Ecuador, but also sheds light on the intrinsic connections and nuances that define
this relationship in the country's legal and social landscape.
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS
On the basis of the literature reviewed, the results of the research are presented:
Key aspects of interplay dynamics in Ecuador
The interplay between citizenship and public order in Ecuador is a complex and
dynamic phenomenon that reflects the constant interaction between individual
rights and collective demands for security and stability in the country's legal and
social context. This intrinsic relationship manifests itself in various aspects ranging
from legal regulation to citizen participation and institutional responses. Some key
aspects of this dynamic in Ecuador are explored below:
Legal and Constitutional Framework: The 2008 Constitution of the Republic of
Ecuador establishes a legal framework that recognises and protects the fundamental
rights of citizens, while giving the state responsibility for maintaining public order.
The Ecuadorian Magna Carta recognises individual rights, but also allows for the
restriction of these rights in the interest of security and the common good. The
interpretation and application of these constitutional principles shape the dynamic
between citizens' rights and the preservation of order (López-Hidalgo, 2019).
Citizen participation: Active citizen participation is a crucial element in interplay
dynamics. In Ecuador, civil society plays a prominent role in the defence of individual
rights and the promotion of a just public order. Social movements, non-
governmental organisations and committed citizens actively contribute to dialogue
and the shaping of policies that balance citizen demands with security needs
(Espinosa, 2009), (Moncayo-Vives, 2020).
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
5
Social and Economic Challenges: Interplay dynamics are also affected by social and
economic challenges specific to Ecuador. Factors such as economic inequality,
migration, criminality and cultural diversity influence citizens' perceptions of the
effectiveness of law enforcement measures. Addressing these problems requires a
delicate balance between protecting individual rights and implementing policies that
ensure collective security (Rodríguez-Galarza, et al. 2023).
Institutional responses: Governmental and judicial institutions play a central role in
interplay dynamics. The way in which the legal system deals with cases involving the
limitation of individual rights for the sake of public order, as well as the effectiveness
of law enforcement institutions, contributes to society's perception of fairness and
justice in the country (Mora-Bernal, et al. 2022).
Regulatory developments: Interplay dynamics are constantly evolving, as laws and
policies adapt to social changes and emerging needs. Reviewing and updating legal
regulations are fundamental processes to ensure that legislation adequately reflects
democratic values and human rights, without compromising public safety (Sacoto-
Romo, & Cordero-Moscoso, 2021).
In summary, the dynamic interplay between citizenship and public order in Ecuador
is a multifaceted field that requires an integral consideration of legal, social and
economic factors. The search for an appropriate balance between the protection of
individual rights and the preservation of public order is essential for the sustainable
development of a just and equitable society.
Balancing individual rights with collective demands for security
and stability in Ecuador
Exploring the balance between individual rights and collective demands for security
and stability in Ecuador reveals a complex and dynamic tapestry that reflects the
challenges inherent in constructing a just legal and social system. As we move
forward in this discussion, it distils the need to carefully consider not only the legal
and constitutional frameworks that lay the foundations of this relationship, but also
the intricate interplay between citizen participation, socio-economic challenges and
institutional responses (Zambrano-Noles, 2011).
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
6
The Magna Carta of 2008, which embraces the principles of human rights and
democracy, serves as a compass, delineating the scope and limits of individual rights
and providing the basis for the management of public order. However, this
constitutional framework is not static; it is a living organism that evolves in response
to changing social and economic dynamics. The discussion of balance, therefore,
cannot be static or confined to the letter of the law; it requires active consideration
of its practical application and adaptations over time.
Citizen participation stands as an essential pillar in the construction of this balance.
The voices of civil society not only act as guardians of individual rights, but also
influence policy formulation and the shaping of collective perceptions of the
effectiveness of security and stability measures. This constant dialogue between
citizens and authorities is crucial to maintain a dynamic balance that responds to
the changing needs of society.
In the context of socio-economic challenges, the discussion on the balance between
individual rights and collective demands expands to address fundamental issues
such as economic inequality, social mobility and cultural diversity. These factors
contextualise how society perceives and values measures that seek to preserve
public order. The ability to adapt to these complexities will contribute directly to the
effectiveness and legitimacy of the policies implemented.
In terms of institutional responses, the debate focuses on the effectiveness and
transparency of the legal and governmental system. How institutions deal with cases
involving the restriction of individual rights and their ability to maintain a balance
between security and freedom reveals the health and robustness of the system as a
whole. This discussion invites critical reflection on the need for an agile and
transparent administration of justice.
The discussion on the balance between individual rights and collective demands in
Ecuador goes beyond a mere legal analysis. It extends to the very roots of society,
demanding comprehensive attention to the complexities that define this
relationship. In this evolving dialogue, the ability to adapt and learn from past
experiences becomes a crucial element in building a system that truly reflects the
fundamental values of a democratic and just society.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
7
Ecuador's contemporary legal scene
In Ecuador's vibrant contemporary legal landscape, the intersection of tradition and
transformation is eloquently manifested. As the complexities of this landscape are
examined, a reflection on the dynamic capacity of the legal system to address
emerging challenges in an evolving society emerges.
At the heart of this discussion is the 2008 Constitution, a beacon that lights the
way to a new era of fundamental rights and social justice. However, this document
is not a static monument, but a living document that resonates with the changing
voices of Ecuadorian society. Contemporary discussion framed in this constitutional
context demands a critical examination of how regulations are translated into
practice, and how the legal system responds to the demands and challenges of an
ever-changing reality.
The consolidation of an effective legal landscape is also shaped by the dynamic
interaction between government institutions and civil society. The ability of these
institutions to interpret and apply the law impartially and efficiently, as well as their
openness to dialogue with society, are essential components in forging a legal
structure that inspires trust and reflects the fundamental values of democracy.
Emerging technologies, globalisation and economic transformations introduce new
challenges that require agile and adaptive responses from the legal system. The
discussion in this regard expands to address issues of cybersecurity, data protection,
and the need for updated regulations that respect individual rights without
sacrificing efficiency in an interconnected world.
In the contemporary legal fabric, the lessons of the past are crucial guides for the
future. Judicial precedents, legislative decisions and case law form a corpus that
must be interpreted with wisdom and flexibility to adapt to the changing demands
of society. Discussion of the contemporary legal landscape invites reflection on how
lessons from the past can inform future decisions and how the continuity of justice
can be ensured in the midst of social evolution (Mila, 2020).
Ultimately, Ecuador's contemporary legal landscape presents itself as fertile ground
for reflection and innovation. The discussion in this section of the scientific article
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
8
seeks not only to examine the current reality, but also to project visions that inspire
meaningful change. In this process of exploration, the capacity of the legal system
to be a catalyst for progress and equity becomes a crucial factor for the future of
justice in the country.
Exploring the Commandments of Security: In-Depth Analysis of
the Organic Code of Public Security and Public Order Entities
(COESCOP)
In the intertwined pages of the Registro Oficial Supplement 19 of 21 June 2017,
the normative epicentre that shapes the legal architecture of citizen security and
public order in Ecuador emerges: the Organic Code of Citizen Security and Public
Order Entities (COESCOP). In this analytical odyssey, we unearth the foundations,
examine the main beams and explore the ramifications of this code, whose contours
transcend the printed words to penetrate the very essence of citizen coexistence
(Castro, & Suárez-Merino, 2023).
Each article, each provision, is a brick in the construction of COESCOP's foundations.
From the definition of competencies and responsibilities of citizen security entities
to the precise delimitation of actions that safeguard public order, the code stands
as an architectural guide that embodies the vision of a safe and orderly society. A
detailed review of these foundations provides a clear understanding of the
guidelines governing the actions of security entities.
But beyond the surface of the words, the analysis dives between the lines of
COESCOP, looking for subtleties and possible interpretations: how do individual
rights balance with the authority of security entities? To what extent does the code
safeguard the integrity of citizens without compromising fundamental freedoms?
Critical reflection becomes our beacon, illuminating not only the declared intentions,
but also the practical implications of each provision. COESCOP is not just a treatise
on theories; it is a tool for application in the field of everyday reality.
From control operations to the management of mass events, each article of the code
faces the acid test in the most diverse situations. How do the provisions translate
into tangible actions? What challenges do security entities face in implementing
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
9
these regulations? This exploration takes COESCOP from the legal pages to the
pragmatic stage. The true effectiveness of any code lies in its ability to positively
impact the reality it seeks to regulate. Our assessment extends beyond the printed
words, scrutinising how COESCOP has influenced citizen security and public order
since its enactment. Have security institutions been strengthened? How has citizen
perception of the code's effectiveness evolved? These answers reveal the true extent
of COESCOP's impact.
In this journey through COESCOP, our aim is not only to decipher the legal
provisions, but also to capture the essence of a code that ultimately seeks to build
a society where security and public order coexist in harmony with the fundamental
principles of a just and equitable democracy.
Exploring the Tapestry of Human Rights: An In-Depth Analysis in
Ecuador's Law and Order
In the vibrant scenario of Ecuador's public order, human rights are not just a letter
of intent; they are the fabric that shapes the very fabric of social coexistence. In this
analysis, we look at how human rights are intertwined with the essence of public
order in Ecuador, beyond mere normative declarations.
Each human right recognised in the Ecuadorian Constitution becomes a foundation
of public order. From the right to life and integrity to freedom of expression, these
rights act not only as individual safeguards, but as pillars underpinning the
construction of a just and equitable society. A review of how these rights are
incorporated into the legal framework is essential to understand their role in
shaping public order (Morán-Mejía,
et al.
2022).
At the heart of the relationship between human rights and public order lies a
persistent ethical dilemma: how to balance the need to maintain security with
unrestricted respect for individual rights? This analysis requires deep reflection on
how public order measures can affect citizen freedom and how to ensure that these
restrictions are aligned with fundamental human rights principles.
Human rights in public order also find expression in citizen participation. The right
to demonstrate and to free association are not only essential to the exercise of
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
10
democracy, but are also critical tools for the expression of the citizen voice in
shaping policy and scrutinising government actions. Their role in maintaining public
order becomes a constant dance between authority and the voice of society
(Atencio-González, 2022).
Human rights, far from being abstract, are anchored in legal guarantees. A review
of how courts interpret and apply these rights in cases related to public order
reveals the strength of the judicial system in protecting fundamental principles. The
guarantee of due process and the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment
act as a protective shield, ensuring that public order measures are within the limits
set by human rights (Tórtora-Aravena, 2010).
The true test of the integration of human rights into law and order is the continuous
assessment of their application in reality: how do these principles translate into
everyday practices; are these rights respected and protected during mass events,
demonstrations or emergency situations? The review is not static; it is a dynamic
assessment of the effective coexistence of human rights and public order.
In this in-depth analysis, we not only discern human rights in Ecuador's public order,
but also seek to understand how these two spheres intertwine in a complex dance.
Beyond the legal rhetoric, the true measure of success lies in Ecuador's ability to
build a public order that not only maintains security, but does so while respecting
and promoting human rights as the very soul of democratic coexistence (Macías-
Fernández,
et al
. 2023).
CONCLUSIONS
At the crossroads between citizenship and public order in Ecuador, a complex
tapestry emerges, woven from the threads of individual rights and collective
demands for security and stability. This phenomenon, far from being static, reveals
an intrinsic dynamic that manifests itself in every corner of the country's legal and
social context. As we explore the intricacies of this interplay, from the legal
framework to citizen participation and institutional responses, several key aspects
are distilled that shed light on the complexity of this relationship.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
11
The legal and constitutional framework, delineated by the 2008 Constitution, acts
as the backbone of this dynamic, recognising fundamental rights while granting the
state responsibility for maintaining law and order. However, the true essence is
revealed in the interpretation and application of these constitutional principles,
which shape the balance between citizens' rights and the preservation of order.
Citizen participation emerges as a leading actor, weaving its influence into the
dialogue and formulation of policies that seek to balance citizen demands with
security needs. Social movements, non-governmental organisations and committed
citizens stand as guardians of individual rights, actively contributing to the shaping
of a just and equitable society.
Social and economic challenges, from economic inequality to cultural diversity,
influence citizens' perceptions of the effectiveness of law enforcement measures.
Addressing these challenges requires a delicate balance between protecting
individual rights and implementing policies that ensure collective security.
Institutional responses, both governmental and judicial, play a central role. How the
legal system deals with the restriction of individual rights in the interest of public
order, together with the effectiveness of law enforcement institutions, contributes
to society's perception of fairness and justice in the country.
Regulatory evolution, constantly adapting to social changes and emerging needs, is
essential to ensure that legislation adequately reflects democratic values and human
rights without compromising public security.
In sum, the dynamic interplay between citizenship and law and order in Ecuador is
a multifaceted field that requires a comprehensive consideration of legal, social and
economic factors. The search for an appropriate balance between the protection of
individual rights and the preservation of public order is essential for the sustainable
development of a just and equitable society. In this analytical journey, we not only
decipher the key elements of this dynamic, but also underline the importance of
maintaining a constant and adaptive dialogue to build a strong and resilient social
fabric in Ecuador.
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
12
FUNDING
Non-monetary
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There is no conflict of interest with persons or institutions involved in the research.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To the Ecuadorian society that struggles to find truth and justice.
REFERENCES
Atencio-González, Rously Eedyah. (2022). Importancia de los Derechos Humanos en la Sociedad
[Importance of Human Rights in Society].
Iustitia Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias
Jurídicas y Criminalísticas
,
7
(12), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i12.1569
Azanza-Torres, María Luisa. (2022). Aplicación del estándar del principio de igualdad en la
jurisprudencia contemporánea de la corte constitucional del Ecuador [Application of the
standard of the principle of equality in the contemporary jurisprudence of the constitutional
court of Ecuador].
Ius Humani. Revista de Derecho
,
11
(1), 75-106. Epub 01 de junio de
2022.https://doi.org/10.31207/ih.v11i1.297
Castro, S., & Suárez-Merino, E. N. (2023). Graduación de las sanciones en faltas administrativas
disciplinarias según el COESCOP y la seguridad jurídica [Graduation of penalties for
administrative disciplinary offences according to COESCOP and legal certainty].
CIENCIA
UNEMI
,
16
(43), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2528-
7737vol16iss43.2023pp114-131p
Espinosa, Mario. (2009). La participación ciudadana como una relación socio-estatal acotada por la
concepción de democracia y ciudadanía [Citizen participation as a socio-state relationship
bounded by the concept of democracy and citizenship].
Andamios
,
5
(10), 71-109
López-Hidalgo, Sebastián. (2019). Configuración de los derechos fundamentales y su contenido
esencial en el constitucionalismo ecuatoriano [The configuration of fundamental rights and
their essential content in Ecuadorian constitutionalism].
Cuestiones constitucionales
, (41),
221-247. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2019.41.13946
Macías-Fernández, Walter Samno, & Campain Márquez., Jorge Ney. (2023). Justiciabilidad directa de
los Derechos Humanos y exigencia de ratificación de Instrumentos Internacionales en el
Ecuador [Direct Justiciability of Human Rights and the Requirement of Ratification of
International Instruments in Ecuador].
Revista San Gregorio
,
1
(54), 269-
292. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i54.1982
Mila, Frank. (2020). La responsabilidad penal de las personas jurídicas en el derecho ecuatoriano
[The criminal liability of legal persons in Ecuadorian law].
Ius et Praxis
,
26
(1), 149-
170. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122020000100149
Moncayo-Vives, Guido Andrés. (2020). Participación ciudadana y politización institucional: veinte
años de un dicotómico quinto poder en Ecuador [Citizen Participation and Institutional
Politicisation: Twenty Years of a Dichotomous Fifth Estate in Ecuador].
Estado & comunes,
revista de políticas y problemas públicos
,
2
(11), 119-
134. https://doi.org/10.37228/estado_comunes.v2.n11.2020.177
Mora-Bernal, Adriana Elizabeth, Sánchez Sarmiento, Marcela Paz, Cajamarca Torres, Andrea Estefanía,
& Idrovo Torres, Diego Francisco. (2022). El sistema automático de trámite judicial en
Verdad y Derecho
Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Vol. 3(1), 1-15, 2024
Dinámica interplay, derechos ciudadanos, preservación del orden público en el contexto ecuatoriano
Interplay dynamics, citizens' rights, preservation of law and order in the Ecuadorian context
Luis Andrés Crespo-Berti
13
Ecuador: ¿vulnera derechos fundamentales? [The automatic judicial processing system in
Ecuador: does it violate fundamental rights?].
Revista chilena de derecho y tecnología
,
11
(1),
203-228. https://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2022.61859
Morán-Mejía, Mónica Mabel, Atencio-González, Rously Eedyah, & Moreno-Arvelo, Pamilys Milagros.
(2022). Vulneración de los derechos humanos a migrantes venezolanos en tiempos de
pandemia en Ecuador [Human rights violations against Venezuelan migrants in times of
pandemic in Ecuador].
Iustitia Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y
Criminalísticas
,
7
(12), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i12.1575
Rey-Varela, J. M. (2023). Perspectiva dinámica de los derechos sociales y retos para una buena
administración [A dynamic perspective on social rights and the challenges of good
governance].
Lex Social: Revista De Derechos Sociales
,
13
(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.46661/lexsocial.7939
Rincón, Andrés. (2018). Abordajes teóricos sobre la relación entre seguridad ciudadana y violencia
urbana en Colombia: una lectura crítica [Theoretical approaches to the relationship between
citizen security and urban violence in Colombia: a critical reading].
URVIO Revista
Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad
, (22), 86-
100. https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.22.2018.3149
Rodríguez-Galarza, Fidel Ernesto, Vera Alcívar, David Gonzalo, & Carrera-Reyes, Carlos Enrique.
(2023). Alternativas y desafíos para enfrentar la transición de la era post petrolera en el
Ecuador [Alternatives and challenges to face the transition of the post-oil era in
Ecuador].
FIGEMPA: Investigación y Desarrollo
,
16
(2), 143-
162. https://doi.org/10.29166/revg.v16i2.4721
Sacoto-Romo, María Carolina, & Cordero-Moscoso, Juan Manuel. (2021). E-justicia en Ecuador:
inclusión de las TIC en la administración de justicia [E-justice in Ecuador: inclusion of ICTs in
the administration of justice].
Foro: Revista de Derecho
, (36), 91-
110. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.36.5
Tórtora-Aravena, Hugo. (2010). Las limitaciones a los derechos fundamentales [Limitations on
fundamental rights].
Estudios constitucionales
,
8
(2), 167-
200. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002010000200007
Villegas-Díaz, M. (2023). Ley de Seguridad del Estado y delitos contra el orden público [State
Security Act and offences against public order].
Revista De Derecho
,
36
(1), 307–327.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502023000100307
Zambrano-Noles, Silvia. (2016). El acceso a la justicia y la tutela judicial efectiva en relación con la
seguridad ciudadana en Ecuador [Access to justice and effective judicial protection in
relation to citizen security in Ecuador].
Tla-melaua
,
9
(39), 58-78.
Copyright: 2024 By the authors. This article is open access and distributed under the terms and conditions of
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licence.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/